Formation of Students’ Reading Competence in the Conditions of Integrated Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v16.n3.648-656Palavras-chave:
competent reader, reading competence, structure of teaching reading, innovative methods of teaching reading, integration of learning activities, integrated training coursesResumo
O moderno sistema educacional global está passando por mudanças significativas devido à globalização e integração, ao desenvolvimento de tecnologias inovadoras e ao surgimento de novas abordagens, métodos de ensino, novos conceitos e tendências na esfera educacional. A questão do desenvolvimento da competência comunicativa, que inclui a capacidade de expressar conceitos, pensamentos, sentimentos, factos e pontos de vista através de formas de actividade linguística e, em particular, através da leitura e da sua interpretação, é particularmente relevante. Face ao exposto, o problema da introdução de métodos inovadores de ensino da leitura na prática de uma escola primária moderna assume particular relevância nos dias de hoje. A leitura dinâmica eficaz é extremamente significativa, uma vez que ensinar os alunos a ler corretamente em tempo hábil é o primeiro passo para alcançar o objetivo principal de ensinar as crianças a ler pensativamente, silenciosamente e em um nível aceitável de leitura dinâmica como base para a compreensão independente da informação espaço e o meio ambiente em geral. O objetivo do trabalho acadêmico é determinar o lugar da competência leitora do aluno no sistema de objetivos pedagógicos e educacionais, para delinear as características do desenvolvimento desse tipo de habilidade com base nos resultados de estudos psicológicos, pedagógicos, teóricos, literários e metodológicos. da atividade de leitura dos alunos conduzida por cientistas. Além disso, a investigação visa delinear as principais tendências nos estudos científicos modernos sobre o desenvolvimento da competência de leitura, bem como destacar as características do desenvolvimento eficaz da competência de leitura dos alunos nas condições de aprendizagem integrada. No decorrer da pesquisa, foram utilizados os métodos analítico-bibliográfico e o método de análise de sistemas para estudar o conceito e a estrutura de formação da competência de leitura. Paralelamente, foram aplicadas análise, síntese de informações, detalhamento e comparação para identificar as principais características das habilidades de leitura com foco no seu desenvolvimento na aprendizagem integrada. Além disso, métodos lógicos e linguísticos, abstração e idealização foram utilizados para estudar e processar os resultados de pesquisas de cientistas nacionais e estrangeiros sobre a formação da competência de leitura de alunos do ensino fundamental. Com base nos resultados da investigação, foram estabelecidos os principais aspectos teóricos mais importantes da questão da formação da competência de leitura dos alunos, nomeadamente, o conceito e a estrutura deste tipo de habilidade. Outra direção significativa do artigo científico é estudar os pontos de vista dos estudiosos sobre os principais vetores modernos do processo de ensino da leitura.Referências
Akimov, N. et al. (2023). Components of education 4.0 in open innovation competence frameworks: Systematic review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9, 2, 100037. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853123001397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100037
Alghonaim, A. S. (2020). Impact of Related Activities on Reading Comprehension of EFL Students English Language Teaching; Vol. 13, No. 4. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1247943.pdf. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n4p15
Allee-Herndon, K. A. & Roberts, S. K. (2020). The Power of Purposeful Play in Primary Grades: adjusting Pedagogy for Children’s Needs and Academic Gains. Journal of Education, 201, 54-63. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0022057420903272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057420903272
Andersson, C. & Palm, T. (2018). Reasons for teachers’ successful development of a formative assessment practice through professional development: A motivation perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(6), 576-597. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1430685. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1430685
Brackett, M. A., Bailey, C. S., Hoffmann, J. D. & Simmons, D. N. (2019). RULER: A theory-driven, systemic approach to social, emotional, and academic learning. Educational Psychologist, 54(3), 144-161. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00461520.2019.1614447?journalCode=hedp20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1614447
Drake, S. M. & Reid, J. (2018). Integrated Curriculum as an Effective Way to Teach 21st Century Capabilities. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324250557_Integrated_Curriculum_as_an_Effective_Way_to_Teach_21st_Century_Capabilities. https://doi.org/10.30777/APJER.2018.1.1.03
Enochsson, A.-B. & Ribaeus, K. (2021). Everybody has to get a chance to learn: Democratic aspects of digitalisation in preschool. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49, 1087-1098. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10643-020-01117-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01117-6
Ernst, J. R. & Reynolds, A. J. (2021). Preschool instructional approaches and age 35 health and well-being. Preventive Medicine Reports, 23, 101498. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335521001881?via%3Dihub. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101498
Forsling, K. (2021). Children's Cultural Backpack and Preschool Education: A Design-Based Study in a Swedish Preschool. In L. Haas & J. Tussey (Eds.), Connecting Disciplinary Literacy and Digital Storytelling in K-12 Education (pp. 169-191). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-5770-9.ch009.
Håland, A., Wagner, Å. K. H. & McTigue, E. M. (2021). How do Norwegian second-grade teachers use guided reading? The quantity and quality of practices. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 21, 1-28. Available at: https://l1research.org/article/view/327. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2021.21.01.02
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A. & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding he role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275-285. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666412722000137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Huang, J., Saleh, S. & Liu, Y. (2021). A Review on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10, 3, 206. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351470728_A_Review_on_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Education. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0077
Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė, D. & Mereckaitė-Kušleikė, I. (2023). Conditions for Successful Learning of Primary School Pupils in the Context of Integrated Education: A Case Study. Interchange, 54, 229-251. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10780-023-09489-5
Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė, D. & Mereckaitė-Kušleikė, I. (2023). Conditions for Successful Learning of Primary School Pupils in the Context of Integrated Education: A Case Study. Interchange, 54, 229-251. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10780-023-09489-5
Júnior, N. B., Faccin, K., Volkmer Martins, B. & Balestrin A. (2019). Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities for sustainable innovation: the case of the green plastic project. Sustainability, 11, p. 2392. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2392. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082392
KUTOR. Communal institution of the Ternopil Regional Council "Center for Analytical-Methodological and Material-Technical Support for the Development of Educational Institutions of the Region". Available at: https://rozvytok-osvity.te.ua/uchni-pochatkovykh-klasiv-staly-hirshe/
Lindeman, S., Svensson, M. & Enochsson, A.B. (2021). Digitalisation in early childhood education: a domestication theoretical perspective on teachers’ experiences. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 4, 4879-4903. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-021-10501-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10501-7
Magen-Nagar, N. & Firstater, E. (2019). The obstacles to ICT implementation in the kindergarten environment: Kindergarten teachers’ beliefs. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 33, 2, 165-179. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02568543.2019.1577769. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2019.1577769
Mertala, P. (2019). Digital technologies in early childhood education: Aframe analysis of preservice teachers’ perceptions. Early Child Development and Care, 189, 8, 1228-1241. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03004430.2017.1372756. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2017.1372756
Miñoza, M. V. & Montero, M. A. (2019). Reading comprehensionlevel among intermediate learners. Science International (Lahore), 31, 3,561-568. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED596833.pdf
Neuman, M. J. & Powers, S. (2021). Political prioritization of early childhood education in low- and middle-income countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 86, October 2021. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059321001115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102458
Nilsson, M., Ferholt, B. & Lecusay, R. (2018). “The Playing-Exploring Child”: reconceptualizing the Relationship between Play and Learning in Early Childhood Education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 19, 231-245. Available at: Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1463949117710800. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949117710800
Ozcan, M. (2021). Factors Affecting Students’ Academic Achievement according to the Teachers’ Opinion Submitted. Education Reform Journal, 6, 1. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1318651.pdf. http://doi.org/10.22596/erj2021.06.01.1.18
Parker, R. Thomsen, B.S. & Berry, A. (2022). Learning Through Play at School – A Framework for Policy and Practice. Frontiers in Education, 17, February 2022. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2022.751801/full
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.751801
Ponomariovienė, J. & Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė, D. (2022). Developing General and Subject Competences of Primary School Pupils in the Context of Integrated Education: the Case of one Lithuanian School. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 13(2), 659-680. Available at: https://jecs.pl/index.php/jecs/article/view/1450. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2022.2.659.680
Starahina, I., Tereshhenko, V. & Panchenkov, A. (2020). New Ukrainian school: development of reading competence among primary school students in the system of integrated education: educational and methodological manual. Harkiv. Sonyashnyk, 176.
Stuart, J., Castro, F., Gebelein, J. & Luis, S. (2023). Landscape Literature Review: The Inclusive Campus of the Future: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, Extended Reality, and Student Success in Minority-Serving Institutions. FIU Immersive Learning in Extended Reality Lab. Available at: https://ilxr.fiu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/89/2023/02/Inclusive-Campus-Landscape-Literature-Review.pdf
Tomas, M., Villaros, E. & Galman, S. (2021). The Perceived Challenges in Reading of Learners: Basis for School Reading Programs. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 9, 107-122. Available at: https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=109033. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.95009.
Van der Heijden, H. R. M. A., Beijaard, D., Geldens, J. J. M. & Popeijus, H. L. (2018). Understanding teachers as change agents: an investigation of primary school teachers’ self-perception. Journal of Educational Change, 19, 347. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10833-018-9320-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-018-9320-9
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Olena Stepanenko, Mykola Suriak, Svitlana Trubacheva, Pavlo Sirenko, Iryna Vlasiuk
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.
The BRAJETS follows the policy for Open Access Journals, provides immediate and free access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge and provides more international democratization of knowledge. Therefore, no fees apply, whether for submission, evaluation, publication, viewing or downloading of articles. In this sense, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms: A) The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal. B) Authors are authorized to distribute non-exclusively the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in the institutional and non-institutional repository, as well as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. C) Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, online repositories or on their personal page), as well as to increase the impact and citation of the published work.